In 1971, the U.S. Office of Naval Medical Research issued a report listing various types of health effects produced by exposures to microwave frequency electromagnetics fields (EMFs).
In it they listed over 100 different effects produced by low intensity, non-thermal exposures. These include:
The Naval report also provided approximately 2,000 studies documenting the various non-thermal effects of these low intensity microwave frequencies (EMFs).
Since then, there have been dozens of other reviews that have documented non-thermal effects and thousands of specific studies.
In 2015, an appeal to the UN and all member states was signed by 206 scientists from 40 countries. The appeal states that the current safety guidelines/standards are inadequate because they don’t take into consideration non-thermal effects. The 206 scientist signers all had published peer-reviewed scientific papers on biological effects of EMFs, collectively having published over 2,000 such papers.
With such a petition by eminent scientists, there should be no question that there is an international scientific consensus on the existence of non-thermal health effects. The calculations of industry claiming that these EMF fields are not strong enough to do anything are off by a factor of sometimes 7.2 million (which means they allow us to be exposed to EMFs that are 7.2 million times too high). We know that ionizing radiation knocks electrons out and produces free radicals. There is a strong argument that microwaves are more dangerous than ionizing radiation (the opposite of what we’ve been told).
Other pathological effects in regard to attack on brain function and attack on the integrity of our genes include:
Statements herein have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. No product mentioned herein is intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. The information on this website is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of the sfileaw.com staff and contributors. It is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and it is not intended as medical advice. You should keep in mind that cited references to ongoing scientific study are most likely not accepted by the FDA as conclusive. These references and mentions of benefits others purport to have received have not been vetted, and are disavowed as product claims and are only included for educational value and as starting points for your own research. No particular food, supplement, water, air, light, sound (music), life-style or relationship can be considered safe or desirable for all individuals. What may benefit 999,999 of a million people may harm you. Therefore, no one can take responsibility for your health except you in consult with your trusted health professional.
Toll Free Phone:
Copyright 2018. All rights reserved.